I know that this has been asked earlier, but I haven’t found a solution for my problem.
I would like to generate longer (not random length!) gates, across several steps, so that everything is tied to some base tempo - clock signal, LFO with square wave or whatever.
Using Countdown and Gate modifier from Count Modula almost gives me the answer - only thing that is missing is the ability to specify count value in Countdown, the number of steps that is counted.
My first thought would be to use a 1-shot gate sequencer with each channel using a different step length, and those are then sent to a switch to control which gate length you want to use with cv.
The gate sequencer is clocked with your main clock source, so whatever gate length you choose from the switch will always be synced.
It’s not terribly modular of me, but Encore from BiDoo will make any length gate from 1/32nd up to its 64 step pattern length. For making a more “human” part I will often use this one to nudge parts off the clock slightly with the “trim” feature, lets you be early or late in smallish increments. Plus you get 2 more channels of cv, it’s pretty awesome.
I don’t quite understand that. The plus minus buttons set the starting number to count down from. Or do you want to be able to set them via a CV input?
Basically what I want is a module where I can create gate from trigger A to trigger B, or one that crates gate from x sequential triggers. I’m a software engineer so I’m tempted to tip my toe in the rack module development and create the one I’m looking for
On second reading I get a second interpretation of what you are looking for, and maybe this will get you started.
If you plug, say, CV1 into the TEMPO input jack, then you can program in different delays between the steps. Both TRIG and CLK outputs give pulses on each step transition.
If the second and third rows of knobs are all the same, then CV2 and CV3 won’t appear to change, but you can always use CLK or TRIG and maybe a gate modifier to interrupt the outputs of CV2 and CV3. Or set some to zero for spaces between gates. Or don’t, and let multiple steps run uninterrupted for fewer but much longer gates.
It would still work if you have to use a different sequencer and an external clock source. ADDR-SEQ and a stack of ASX would give lots of different steps
The limitation with elsker and rael is that if I use 1, or larger, in duration field, I basically create gate that is always on. Or is there a way around this?
‘Problem’ with the one is that after the gates has been on, there is equal gate off period because (?) Seq 3 doesn’t provide option to adjust the pule width, of course we can use sequencer that supports it