Those beta builds are from a month ago, they won’t be compatible with Rack v2.0.0.
1 Like
I can’t find VCV Recorder? Any news if that will make it to version 2?
1 Like
Posts on here have suggested it will, in upgraded form, but just needs some more work first.
Personally my fingers are crossed for faster than real-time rendering but we’ll see!
2 Likes
I’ve built it for Linux (for v2) but haven’t tested it yet.
1 Like
Is anyone looking at TheXOR? I would really hate to see them lost, there is a massive update ready that never made it into the library. They require some tweaks to the code though I think.
1 Like
1 Like
does anyone know if wiqid will be in v2?
Ben (ablaut) has previously said he would update them, and Repelzen.
4 Likes
Oh that’s good news. Bread and butter for me. Yay
1 Like
Is there any news on Entrian?
3 Likes
Pretty sure Ritchie is doing VCV support (unless there is another great dev called Ritchie around) so perhaps he’s busy with that. Has to be a good sign that he’s involved though, I would imagine his modules being updated will only be a matter of time.
2 Likes
Will Southpole be making it into the library? I’m sure I read mentions of it working somewhere.
yes, as time allows for the dev
2 Likes
I cloned the Stocaudio repo, changed the version to “2.01” at the top of plugin.json and it built fine.
It also appears to work. I mostly cared about Spread - which converts polyphonic to monophonic with variable width (i.e. spreading voices across the stereo field) and attenuation. But I’ll try other modules.
These were developed by @aptrn (Allesandro Petrone), and I don’t know if anyone has asked him about V2 plans.
1 Like
Hi Omri, I value your opinion, so I’d like to know, would you like the “key” in a stereo Oppressor to be:
- mono and apply to both main-channels
- stereo and apply to the respective main-channel? (dual mono)
- stereo but have the loudest key-channel per band from each key-channel to apply to both main-channels
I am also imagining a “mix” would be useful where the key is mixed in the output…
Many thanks!
I think in mine (Comp II) “stereo” is dual mono, “linked stereo” is mono and apply to both?
1 Like
I appreciate I, thank you 
I guess that you will have a new module for that? Since there’s not a lot of space on the panel. In that case, I think that having a dual mono solution might be best, and have the “left” channel normalize to the right in case you have a stereo input but a mono key signal. If indeed you’re planning to create a new module, it would be interesting to have an envelope output for the effect envelope so the oppression (ducking) itself.
Thanks again so much!
I’ve asked Gerhard if I could take over the maintenance of both Southpole repos. He asked that we speak of this by email and I wrote to him with an explanation of what’s involved and my future plans, including the addition of other modules which I’ve done. He has yet to get back to me after about 2 weeks so I’m assuming he’s busy with his physics work @ CERN.
So for the time being neither Southpole collection will be in the library. Due to other commitments I have slowed down my work on them for the time being. Rest assured they will be finished. They’re in private repos atm to allow time for Gerhard to get back to me as I want him to have the first review of them in case he wants to change some things himself.
6 Likes
Yeah, new module for sure.
Dual-mono with Left and Right normalled inputs sounds perfect. Many thanks!
For the envelopes cv-out… it would mean 20 outputs (10 bands, 2 channels), alternatively this could be a separate module too… like mono-audio-in to 10-band-envelopes…
Would you want those to:
- follow the envelope of the input
- follow the “oppression”, i.e. High when no oppression, and lower when oppressed… so follow the volume-“fader” of the band.