Is docB OscS working as expected?
It is described as an alias free sawtooth oscillator but I’m not sure if the gap in the wave is a bug or a feature.
My settings: 48khz, VCV RAck Free 2.5.2 Windows x64, under Win11
Regards, Andras
Is docB OscS working as expected?
It is described as an alias free sawtooth oscillator but I’m not sure if the gap in the wave is a bug or a feature.
My settings: 48khz, VCV RAck Free 2.5.2 Windows x64, under Win11
Regards, Andras
weird, at 44.1 and 48 works fine up to buffer 512, other settings do that weird stuff (I’m on win10)
@docB -------^
it worked fine with 256 at 48000 on ubuntu 20. On ubuntu 24 it needs 1024. So it cannot work on higher sample rates. Hmm. Please see these modules as experimental for now, i will check where the problem is. I also working on a version using opencl which computes all partials of e.g 32 samples in parallel and mitigates the overhead in this way. May be it gets better.