My new album on Component Recordings "The Names Of Flowers"

As I dive into Rack composition more and more, I become more musically productive. I lash some new combinations of modules and sequences together and have something that I like much quicker than when I run Ableton Live, add instruments, and then program patterns. Working in Rack seems a lot more rewarding, because you experiment to arrive at an end result. And the experimentation is the reward.

A friend of mine once told me (of their own music) “I got a lot more productive when I lowered my standards.” This is a flippant comment, meant to be humorous, but it points out something important: music is subjective, there’s no absolute scale of quality, so worrying about how your stuff fits on other people’s continuum of quality is wasted effort.

If you’re making music for the right reasons, you let go of trying to fit a particular genre or scene. Make the music you want to hear. You are here to leave a meaningful, positive mark on the world, and you can’t do that if your musical imagination is hemmed in by trying to fit in with what other people make.

There will be more successful artists than you, by someone else’s standards of excellence. Your success should be personal and unique to you. If you try to make the perfect techno, or trance, or gabber track, you might succeed, but musical genres are limiting. There are people who can make a good, even sometimes great techno track. There are people who can make adequate tracks by conforming to genre strictures. But it’s never entirely your unique music if you’re trying to sound like other people.

Personally, I feel like I’m doing my best work, after 30 years of trying. That’s roughly 25 years of being a huge fan, and being frustrated by trying to be a techno producer, because the limitations to the form frustrated me. The people who are really good at making techno don’t feel limited by sticking to genre, and find a way to make their own best music within the limits of the genre. That wasn’t me, and furthermore, I’m a good enough judge of techno (and house & drum and bass etc) that I know my attempts at techno aren’t as good as theirs.

It may sound arrogant - and maybe it is - but I’m at a point where what I write in words is like the music I make: I try and make it as good as I can, but I think of how it affects other people last. I know what I like to listen to, and if I release something it’s because I like it enough to listen to it repeatedly myself.

I’m my own audience. Based on sales, what I do works for roughly 30 people worldwide. But making the music is the exciting part. I submitted this album for release in March of 2024. I’d listened to these tracks to death, but when I sent it to Robert at Component, I moved on to the music I was making in the present.

Listening to this now is surprising to me. I still like the tracks, but I hear things I didn’t in them when I was making them. And that’s another goal to shoot for in your music: Be able to surprise yourself.

15 Likes

Awesome! Well said. Looking forward to sitting down with this and giving it a proper listen!

This resonates with me. I’m approaching the music world having been a software developer my whole career. I have no musical training, and I didn’t grow up playing any instruments. There are so many people with far more musical skill and talent than I, who never manage to get any attention or money for their music. So what am I even doing here? Talk about impostor syndrome!

But I’m not in this as a career; it is for the pure enjoyment of it. Reflecting on that, I had a moment of clarity. What if I define musician as a person who creates sounds that they themselves enjoy listening to?

Thinking this way is quite liberating. I don’t have to be a musician in comparison to anyone else. I can be a musician relative to my own learning, development, and tastes. I can show up every day, work a little to learn and improve, and enjoy the results, however imperfect.

Your emphasis on your own judgment rather than fitting genres or other people’s preferences is spot on.

3 Likes

And, by the way, I’m listening to The Names of Flowers and I’m really enjoying both your composition and the clarity of your mixes.

Thats a testament to the quality of the Mindmeld Mixmaster and EQMaster, and @Squinky Comp II compressor

I use Comp II mostly as a limiter on most channels. It does a good job at keeping peaks under control without killing the transients. EQMaster works best when you cut instead of boost.

And I only add enough to the mix to where it sounds full enough. Rookies always add to many sounds and wonder why they dont fit together.

3 Likes