Yep - Seeds of Change definitely has a similar underlying concept. It adds capability of including pseudo random CV to go along with the gates. But as you say, it only provides for one clock.
Easy enough to get multiple clocks (one clock per sub-division). Clock SOC with a 48 ppqn clock, and then AND each channels gates with a different subdivision of the master clock. Divisions of 12, 6, 3, and 4 will give 1/4, 1/8, 1/16, and 1/4 Triplets, just as with the randomRhythm.
So here is my patch that was inspired by the Vermona randomRhythm.
On Patch storage I have both the selection, as well as the full patch for the demo video.
A list of features is listed on the Patch Storage post.
And here is an off-the-cuff, poorly planned, but hopefully effective demo
I would love to work with a developer willing to build a dedicated VCV module with these features, plus some additional ideas that I have. I’ve got some thoughts as to module layout, some poly input/output options, and other enhancements.
Wow, Thank you so much.
Won’t touch those black cables, promise! 
This is so much more than what I imagined coming out of this. Exactly why I love this community.
These linear mode and offbeat features are super handy.
As for developing a dedicated module, that would definitely something that adds value to the library. @Patheros and I are just about to release my first module idea to the library and I am unsure if he has time for yet another module besides his growing collection. But he would certainly be capable of making this happen.
Awesome work Dave!
Really cool! Definitely seems like something up my ally. Ill send you a DM with some questions 
Pseudo Random is commonly used now as a better idea than completely random.
I remember some talk in the early days of the iPod about the random shuffle setting repeating tracks. They had to adjust the algorithm so no tracks repeat, within a certain time limit iirc. Hence ‘Pseudo Random’.
First time I saw it in VCV was with this module, and it did what I wanted, not playing the same preset/slot twice in a row.
I’ve never noticed that 
All the basic pseudo random algorithms I’m aware of can still repeat values, just like a true set of random numbers.
The times I’ve needed to “randomly” sequence a pool of values without any repeats, I create an array of values. I “randomly” select one of the array positions, taking that value. Then I remove that position from the array and randomly select another position from the smaller pool of values. Repeat until all values exhausted.
Not sure if there is a better way to do that, but it has worked for me.
Yeah I think the idea is to allow repeats, but the probability of a repeat is near zero right after the first instance, increasing slowly as time goes on.
There are a lot of different ways to prevent repeats. Your plan works mostly but can actually cause a repeat if the last item in the list is selected first on the next cycle.
My general strategy for no-repeats is to simply store the previous value and then when I generate a random number, if its the same as the previous one, re-generate a new value. Repeat this until the generated value is not the same as the previous one.
That works for preventing direct repeats which is usually good enough. If you need more you can store a list of the last X values and exclude all of them.
Ooh, interesting. I hadn’t thought about that. It may or may not be OK, depending on your goal. You could combine your strategy below with mine to prevent duplicates each time the list is reset.
Yes. What I don’t like about that strategy is the highly variable time it takes to come up with the next random value. If you have a long list, and there are only a few remaining options left, it might take a lot of attempts before success. I used to do a lot of Windows batch programming, which is inherently slow, and that brute force technique simply didn’t cut it.
I’ve never done batch scripting before, so yeah if that is really slow it can be very annoying. Another issue you can run into is an infinite loop if it CAN’T find a solution. But if it can find a solution its really not that bad. I wrote a simple test here that tests 100 sided dice down to a 2 sided dice, and even with the two sided dice its only about 2x the number of rolls and about 5x as long. But that is compare to a pure random. So the time will be better when compared to another solution for removing repeats.
the last squinky labs module, that I never finished, was a rhythm generator that use stochastic production rules to generate rhythms. Maybe I should have finished it…
Ooo. Im always interested in fun uses of Stochastic Grammers. I definitely would have fun with that if you finished it.
Have you heard of wave function collapse? GitHub - mxgmn/WaveFunctionCollapse: Bitmap & tilemap generation from a single example with the help of ideas from quantum mechanics
My Rhythm Explorer module is now available in the Library! It is very much inspired by the randomRHYTHM, incorporating many of its features, though most definitely not a clone.
Nice stuff Dave, well done. Just trying out the Rhythm Explorer now and a couple of issues I’ve run across with the version that just appeared in the Library…
My module expects a gate at the Run input - It runs while high, and stops while low. It is all in the documentation - I highly recommend reading it because there are a ton of features you are unlikely to figure out if you don’t. Hopefully it is logical and easy to remember once you get an understanding.
I don’t understand what visible controls you expect to change upon a Dice press. I think you are misunderstanding the function, or else I am totally missing your point. Again, I think the documentation may help. Especially the “Basic Principles” section may help in understanding the Dice.
Sorry Dave, I’m so used to modules with scant/no documentation I was out of the habit of looking for it - my bad.
Before reading it I assumed Dice randomly set the density of each of the interval sliders rather than reseeding the pattern per slider.
