Polyphony in clock processing modules?

Development
1

Seems that although multiple polyphony on clock dividers (for example) might be useful, what is the most logical meaning of polyphonic timing?

2

It seems mono is easy, all poly duplication with mono display is easy (with a minor on data show parallelism), but is there some polyrythmic ratio delay counter optimal for clocking?

Should reset be “omni” to all the poly? This is a user choice but are somethings easier for the composer if things are arranged a way?

I had an idea of ratios on the clock outs, or simply unify all the clock ins. What’s an 'arp anyway?

3

Uh … could it be an abbreviation for “arpeggiator”?

4

I thought it was short for Alan Robert Pearlman :wink:

1 Like
5

LOL - why not?

6

Maybe you mean ‘polyrhythmic’?
( see Polyrhythm - Wikipedia )
But IMHO this doesn’t need polyphonic clock dividers :thinking:

7

True, the thing is making polyphonic have some sort of meaning in module development for clocking modules.

I decided on channel 1 (mono) as the module as it would physically be, and higher channels clock (n) latch in the channel (n-1) output so the polyphonic becomes a kind of an arp clocked delay. It made more sense.